Synergistic effect of chronic prolactin suppression and retinoid treatment in the prophylaxis of N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced mammary tumorigenesis in female Sprague-Dawley rats
Abstract
Two hundred forty Sprague-Dawley rats were treated i.v. with 2.5 or 1.25 mg of N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU) per 100 g body weight at 50 and 57 days of age. At 60 days of age, rats given either dose were divided into 4 groups (30 rats/group) and treated as follows: Group 1, controls; Group 2, 0.4 mg 2-bromo-alpha-ergocryptine (CB-154) per 100 g body weight injected s.c. once daily; Group 3, retinyl acetate (328 mg/kg diet) fed daily; and Group 4, CB-154 and retinyl acetate treatments combined. Rats that received the 2.5-mg dose of MNU were treated for 129 days; those that received the 1.25-mg dose of MNU were treated for 175 days. The rats that were treated with the high dose of MNU were maintained without any treatment for an additional 13 weeks, after which they were sacrificed. The rats that were treated with the low dose of the carcinogen were sacrificed immediately after treatment. All rats were palpated once weekly for palpable mammary tumors.
The number of rats with mammary tumors and the total number of mammary tumors at cessation of treatments were, respectively, as follows. MNU (2.5 mg): Group 1, 22 of 30 (73%), 82: Group 2, 11 of 30 (37%), 17; Group 3, 11 of 30 (37%), 19: Group 4, 2 of 30 (7%), 2. MNU (1.25 mg): Group 1, 8 of 30 (27%), 14; Group 2, 4 of 30 (13%), 5; Group 3, 3 of 30 (10%), 4; Group 4, 0 of 30, (0%), 0.
Thus, chronic CB-154 treatment or retinyl acetate feeding markedly reduced the percentage of rates bearing mammary tumors and the total number of mammary tumors.
The combined treatments were superior to either treatment alone, inasmuch as mammary tumorigenesis was nearly completely blocked in the rats of Group 4 that received the 2.5-mg dose of MNU and was totally blocked in the rats of Group 4 that received the 1.25-mg dose of MNU.
Retinyl acetate feeding or CB-154-induced prolactin suppression appear to be equally effective treatments in the prophylaxis of MNU-induced mammary tumorigenesis in rats; the combined modality, however, appears to be far superior than either treatment alone.
See also:
- Official Web Site: The Di Bella Method;
- The Di Bella Method (A Fixed Part - Bromocriptine and/or Cabergoline);
- Prolactin inhibitors in oncology - In vitro, review and in vivo publications;
- Solution of retinoids in vitamin E in the Di Bella Method biological multitherapy;
- Somatostatin in oncology, the overlooked evidences - In vitro, review and in vivo publications;
- Publication, 2018 Jul: Over-Expression of GH/GHR in Breast Cancer and Oncosuppressor Role of Somatostatin as a Physiological Inhibitor (from Di Bella's Foundation);
- Publication, 2019 Aug: The Entrapment of Somatostatin in a Lipid Formulation: Retarded Release and Free Radical Reactivity (from Di Bella's Foundation);
- Publication, 2019 Sep: Effects of Somatostatin and Vitamin C on the Fatty Acid Profile of Breast Cancer Cell Membranes (from Di Bella's Foundation);
- Publication, 2019 Sep: Effects of somatostatin, curcumin, and quercetin on the fatty acid profile of breast cancer cell membranes (from Di Bella's Foundation);
- Publication, 2020 Sep: Two neuroendocrine G protein-coupled receptor molecules, somatostatin and melatonin: Physiology of signal transduction and therapeutic perspectives (from Di Bella's Foundation);
- Complete objective response to biological therapy of plurifocal breast carcinoma.